Trigger Warning

This article includes references to graphic violence, sexual assault, and suicide.

Inside the Daniel Marsh Case: Rehabilitation, Risk, and a Family’s Fight for Justice

Summary: Years after the brutal murders of Claudia Maupin and Chip Northup, their family was confronted with a new wave of fear as California’s youth-justice reforms opened the door for resentencing. Central to the debate: Has killer Daniel Marsh truly changed, or would releasing him endanger the public?

A Video That Reopened Old Wounds

Late one night in 2018, Victoria Hurd—Claudia’s daughter—clicked on a YouTube video and froze. On screen was Daniel Marsh, then 20, delivering a TEDx-style talk from inside a correctional facility. Neatly groomed in a blue prison shirt and sweats, Marsh spoke calmly about trauma, claiming he had been sexually abused as a child (without naming a perpetrator or providing details). He admitted to “hurting people” but did not apologize for murdering Claudia and Chip.

To Victoria, the tone felt arrogant and minimizing—a performance rewarded with a standing ovation from the audience. She and her family pushed to have the video removed; it was taken down. But the video was only a prelude. A new legal chapter was about to begin.

Prop 57 and a High-Stakes Hearing

California voters had passed Proposition 57 in 2016, shifting power to judges (not prosecutors) to decide whether juveniles should be tried as adults. Victoria herself voted for reform—but never imagined it might help Daniel Marsh.

Marsh’s attorneys argued that—despite the savagery of his crimes—Prop 57 applied to him. An appeals court agreed, sending the case back to Yolo County Superior Court for a transfer hearing. If a juvenile judge ruled in Marsh’s favor and he were re-tried in juvenile court, Marsh could potentially walk free at 25 even if reconvicted.

The judge had to weigh the law’s factors:

• Sophistication and gravity of the offense
• Prior juvenile delinquency
• Likelihood of rehabilitation

“Has He Changed?”—Experts Clash

Dr. Matthew Soulier, a child forensic psychiatrist who first evaluated Marsh in 2013, met him again five years later for the defense. Soulier testified that Marsh presented as warmer, acknowledged prior threats, and claimed he had “done the work” in custody—learning to accept responsibility and dismantle “criminal thinking” patterns. Soulier believed there were grounds to consider juvenile jurisdiction, emphasizing the lack of earlier court interventions before the murders.

The prosecution countered with Dr. Matthew Logan, a forensic psychologist specializing in psychopathy. Marsh had scored 35.8 out of 40 on a leading psychopathy checklist at age 18—among the highest Logan had seen. Traits included superficial charm, grandiosity, pathological lying, lack of remorse, and manipulativeness. Logan warned Marsh was unlikely to be rehabilitated using conventional correctional programs and said it was “more likely than not” he could kill again.

Victims’ Family Speaks

During impact statements, Mary Northup, Chip’s daughter, urged the court to protect other families from “suffering as ours has suffered.” She watched Marsh closely; he avoided eye contact. If he were a master manipulator, she thought, he would at least try to feign empathy. He didn’t.

Marsh Testifies

In a surprise move, Marsh took the stand. He admitted to drug use in custody—including heroin—and described participating in programs such as the prison TEDx event. He spoke about “self-centeredness,” entitlement, and accepting responsibility. For the first time, he addressed the families directly and said “I’m sorry.”

To Mary and others, it rang hollow. He framed the murders as the acts of a “different” or “dark” version of himself—not a clear, full ownership of what he did.

The Ruling: Back to Adult Court

After a final recess, the judge issued a written order. Citing the extraordinary gravity and sophistication of the murders and finding that Marsh had made little progress toward rehabilitation in five years, the court returned the case to adult criminal court. Marsh’s original sentence—52-years-to-life—stood.

Another Push for Release—and Another Denial

The legal battles continued as Senate Bill 1391 took effect in 2019, generally barring 14- and 15-year-olds from being tried as adults. Marsh’s team sought to apply the new law retroactively. The case reached the California Supreme Court in 2021, was remanded in 2022, and ultimately rejected in 2023.

As of the latest records cited in the hearing coverage, Daniel Marsh remains in prison and is eligible for parole in December 2036 (subject to change).

Trauma That Lingers

The violence did not end with the murders. In the chaotic early phase of the investigation, Tony, one of Chip’s grandsons, was mistakenly treated as a possible suspect—an ordeal that inflicted deep emotional and financial harm. In October 2016, at age 31, Tony died by suicide, compounding the family’s grief.

Over time, even experts have shifted. When interviewed again in 2025, Dr. Soulier said his perspective had evolved: Marsh “will always be a psychopath,” and releasing him would pose grave danger.

Remembering Claudia and Chip

Through it all, the family insists the story must center on Claudia Maupin and Chip Northup—their warmth, music, daily walks, and the joy they brought to others. They share memories, birthdays, laughter. “My responsibility is to show the world who my grandmother was,” says Sarah Rice. “Not the way she died.”

👉 Read the next case here